A Feminist's Political Epiphany

October 24th, 2012

Is Katherine Fenton The New Sandra Fluke?

Katherine Fenton an undecided voter who posed the question, “In what new ways do you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?” to both presidential candidates during the second presidential debate. Fenton who posed the question that resulted in the binder blunder has now come under harsh criticism from conservatives online and offline. A registered independent, teacher, and daughter of very conservative parents, Fenton claims to have voted for McCain in the 2004 presidential election but cannot decide this time around. What she can make up her mind about is how disgusting the campaign has become this election season in its attacks on individuals for expressing themselves publicly.  Like Georgetown Graduate Sandra Fluke, who in February 2012 faced extreme criticism for giving trying to testify about the importance of an insurance contraception mandate; Katherine Fenton is now facing the same criticism for simply posing a question.  On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh commented on Flukes testimony stating, “[she] says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a slut right? Makes her a prostitute.”  Limbaugh has also been quoted calling debate moderator Candy Crowley a journalistic terrorist. After she posed the legitimate question, Katherine Fenton instantly joined the ranks of Sandra Fluke and Candy Crowley as targets of the right wing conservative media. The Washington Free Beacon instantly painted a negative image of Fenton via her twitter posts, as a drunk, slutty party girl who hates the cops and cant keep it in her pants. Matthew Vadum tweeted “Katherine Fenton, questioner, brings up the feminazi leftist lie that women don’t get paid equally”. Michelle Malkin tweeted in response to Fenton, “SOFTBALL: #ladyparts tool Katherine Fenton asks Obama how he will rectify gender pay disparities. Obama: ‘GREAT QUESTION’ #townhall”. While many other’s have questioned her uncommitted voter status. Both Vadum and Malkin are known conservative media pundits, who have been known to downplay or blatantly deny that the gender pay gap exists.

 

The problem here is the personal attacks being carried out by conservative media against people (specifically women) who speak up and ask questions. What happened to free speech? I thought conservatives were staunch supporters of the First Amendment? I guess only when its utilized to promote their own interests. But seriously, what happened to promoting a healthy debate on key issues and encouraging youth participation? Attacking young women for participating is not only disgusting, but contradicting to the very fundamentals that our political system was founded upon. If Malkin or Vadum actually had something of substance to contribute to the discussion it would not have included Fenton’s name. The real problem is that conservatives do not want to answer these questions and confront the very real issues that women face today because they are worried of loosing swing voters. It seems though, with all of the media attention on their smear campaign, their plan to dodge the real issue and attach the questioner may have backfired. The conservatives reliance on gender stereotypes to advert key policy issues is nothing new, but is becoming more highly publicized. Women’s sexuality has historically been called into question in order to discredit their speech and position of power. Due to modern technology, when this occurs today you can go from an unknown kindergarden teacher one morning to a globally known internet ‘slut’ within hours. These repeated attacks on women who speak up and ask questions sends the wrong message to our youth and will degrade our political system. We need to stop promoting a culture of “hey shut up you woman slut” to “hey lets all get this debate going”.

October 17th, 2012

The Real Problem with Romney’s “Binders Full of Women”

After the gaff there has been multiple jokes, blogs, face books, tumblrs etc. poking fun at Romney’s “binders full of women”. The real problem with the statement, however, is the true disconnection Romney has with ‘women’s issues’. The question posed to Governor Romney was regarding pay equity, his response: “Thank you. And important topic, and one which I learned a great deal about, particularly as I was serving as governor of my state, because I had the chance to pull together a cabinet and all the applicants seemed to be men. And I — and I went to my staff, and I said, “How come all the people for these jobs are — are all men.” They said, “Well, these are the people that have the qualifications.” And I said, “Well, gosh, can’t we — can’t we find some — some women that are also qualified?” And — and so we — we took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet. I went to a number of women’s groups and said, “Can you help us find folks,” and they brought us whole binders full of women.” Romney is so disconnected from the topic his response was not only offensive but off topic. In responding this way he is basically stating that he’s not sexist because he lets women work for him.


Furthermore, he then continued with, “But number two, because I recognized that if you’re going to have women in the workforce that sometimes you need to be more flexible. My chief of staff, for instance, had two kids that were still in school.” If this isn’t a sexist statement, I don’t know what it. Last I checked both women and men have children, so please do clarify this for me, Romney, why employers have to make exceptions for women employees?! Or are you just trying to support the old “women are not as smart as men” argument. Is that why you stated that you were not originally supplied with female applicants and then had to go looking for some who were qualified? The problem here is not that there are no qualified women, the problem is people like you perpetuate a system that suppresses women in just about every aspect of their lives. If Romney really did understand the issues, he would not have made these contradicting statements.


The issue here was/is equal pay. Pay equity is still a serious issue in the US and no matter how many women Romney lets work for him, chances are they will make less money for the same work as their male counterparts. Everyone should have realistic access to employment, and get paid irregardless of sex. However, women still do make less money then men, some studies show women make as low as .77 cents for every dollar of their male counterparts. One of the first bills President Obama signed into law was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act. The effects of which, we will not know until years later when research can be conducted on the effects of the act. Romney refuses to make a statement either in favor of it or against it.